|
|
1994 - A review of three pivotal US trials |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Studies |
Total Dose of |
Trial design differences[4] |
Response rates |
|
Berman et al[1] N=130 |
IDA 36 mg/m" Ara-C 1000 mg/m" |
|
Complete remission |
|
Wiernick et al[2] N=214 |
IDA 39 mg/m" |
|
Complete response rates |
|
Vogler et al[3] N=230 | IDA 36 mg/m" Ara-C 700 mg/m" |
|
Overall remission |
|
Signicantly fewer patients with persistent blasts on the IDAMYCIN arm in every study. |
|---|
|
|
"[Idarubicin] is equivalent, if not superior, to [daunorubicin] in the induction of remisssions and possible prolongation of survival."[3] |
|
Responses in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) with IDAMYCIN in the regimen. |
||
|---|---|---|
|
|
No. newly diagnosed APL pts |
APL response with IDA |
|
Avvista et al [5] |
28 |
82% achieve CR |
|
Berman et al. [6] |
81 |
IDA/ARA-C use - a signigicant factor |
|
"These data suggests that IDR/Ara-C offers improved survival for APL patients."[6] |
||
"Intravenous idarubicin in patients with newly diagnosed AML produces the same degree of nonhematologic toxicity as does daunorubicin, including the potential for cardiotoxicity at high total doses.[4]
WITH IMPROVED CR AND SURVIVAL RATES PLUS FEWER PERSISTENT BLASTS
"Nonetheless, even if the compound [idarubicin] represents only an incremental improvement, it give more patients the opportunity for more intensive postinduction therapy, such as bone marrow transplantation, or innovative approaches to eradicating minimal residual disease, such as the use of recombinant interleukin-2."[4]
|