Hi Cori: I don't understand the stem cell process. Is the article saying
that the only way to get a stem cell transplant is from unborn babies? Your
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stuart Scott Harth [SMTP:email@example.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 07, 1999 12:44 AM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: [MOL] Stem cell research offers us tremendous promise
> Dear Marty - this is what I was referring to....I've had 2 transplants in
> past year. I know they have helped me tremendously. Please talk to Dr.
> He's a pioneer in this field. Keep in touch. Love always. Cori. Martin
> Auslander wrote:
> > Gov't Recommends Embryo Research
> > By WILLIAM C. MANN .c The Associated Press
> > WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Clinton's top advisory panel on medical
> > ethics
> > is recommending government financing of limited forms of research on
> > human
> > embryos to build on discoveries promising huge medical advances.
> > The National Bioethics Advisory Commission acknowledged the report was
> > likely
> > to raise controversy but said the research's promise for the betterment
> > of
> > mankind merits the recommendations.
> > A draft report outlining reasons for the decision by the National
> > Bioethics
> > Advisory Commission says Congress should rescind parts of its four-year
> > ban
> > on spending federal money for embryonic research.
> > Instead, it recommends a regime of tightly controlled experiments to
> > obtain
> > so-called ``stem cells'' from embryos left over from procedures at
> > fertility
> > clinics. They would be used only with the consent of the parents for
> > whom the
> > embryos were created.
> > Stem cells have been shown in recent years to be building blocks for
> > almost
> > all human tissue. Scientists say the cells' capability to grow into
> > virtually
> > any tissue raises the possibility of growing spare body parts or
> > correcting
> > disorders such as Parkinson's disease or diabetes.
> > ``This research is allied with a noble cause, and any taint that might
> > attach
> > from the source of the stem cells diminishes in proportion to the
> > potential
> > good which the research may yield,'' the report says.
> > Janet Parshall, chief spokeswoman for the Family Research Council,
> > criticized
> > the recommendation as ``a classic example of situational ethics.''
> > ``I think it's the worst kind of utilitarianism .... to say we will
> > destroy
> > these so those can live,'' she said. ``One would only hope that common
> > sense
> > and compassion would rule the day rather than scientific advancement.''
> > Judy Brown, president of the American Life League, also attacked the
> > commission conclusion.
> > ``There are not two classes of human beings,'' she said. ``The embryo
> > baby is
> > no different than any other human being and should never be subjected to
> > destructive research.''
> > The bioethics panel's recommendation, being announced officially next
> > month,
> > goes further than a proposal last month from a National Institutes of
> > Health
> > advisory committee on financing research in stem cells, which are
> > obtainable
> > only from human embryos or very early fetuses. The NIH rules would allow
> > the
> > institutes to finance studies only on cell cultures grown in
> > laboratories and
> > not taken from embryos.
> > Embryos are destroyed in the process of harvesting stem cells, a reason
> > such
> > research has raised emotional debate in Congress and elsewhere between
> > people
> > on both sides of the abortion question. At least 75 members of Congress
> > have
> > said all stem-cell research violates the money ban, which has been
> > extended
> > annually since its enactment in 1994.
> > Committee members reported wide agreement that women should not be
> > allowed to
> > terminate a pregnancy to donate the fetal material for research. In
> > discussing a possible abortion, it said, the possibility of research on
> > the
> > aborted material should not be brought up by the physician unless asked.
> > AP-NY-05-23-99 1821EDT
> > God Bless All,
> > marty auslander
This is an automatically-generated notice. If you'd like to be removed
from the mailing list, please visit the Medicine-On-Line Discussion Forum
at <http://www.meds.com/con_faq.html>, or send an email message to:
with the subject line blank and the body of the message containing the line:
unsubscribe mol-cancer your-email-address
where the phrase your-email-address is replaced with your actual email