RE: [MOL] Pet Scan - Al Larson [01953] Medicine On Line


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [MOL] Pet Scan - Al Larson



Hi:  I know what the differences of the scans are.  My question was would
(1) one PET Scan take the place of a (CT Scan lung - CT Scan Abdomen & Rib
Xray).  The tumor in my rt. lung is 2 cm so you could see that for sure.  It
just seems if the insurance co. is going to pay for the other 3 tests  which
they will - wouldn't paying for 1 PET Scan make more sense if it's feasible.
The real plus of that would be you could see if there were any new tumors
under the size of 2 cm. and maybe see where my rib pain is coming from.  The
last bone scan I had last month didn't show anything - but the pain is
coming from somewhere....sometimes I begin to think I'm crazy.  

Thanks for getting back to me.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Alvin Larson [SMTP:arl@swcp.com]
> Sent:	Wednesday, May 26, 1999 7:32 PM
> To:	mol-cancer@lists.meds.com
> Subject:	Re: [MOL] Pet Scan
> 
> Argila, June wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Anyone:  I have a question.  I have to set up an appt. for a CT Scan
> of
> > Lung, CT Scan of Abdomen and Xray of ribs.  If I were to have a Pet Scan
> -
> > would that test cover the other three (3) tests?  Anyone?
> > 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The PET scan is done by injecting radio-active glucose into 
> a vein and waiting for it the collect in the tumors (tumors
> like glucose). The radio-active source produces positrons,
> which are captured very near the tumor, the positrons produce
> gamma rays which leave the body and are collected by a group
> of detectors.  Information from the detectors is processed by
> a computer to produce an image.  
> 
> The PET scan has about a 5 times better resolution than 
> CT scans and X-rays, which cannot see tumors less than 
> 1-cm in size.  Not only does the PET scan see much 
> smaller tumors than CT scans, it can cover the whole
> body to see metastasis that may be in the bones, brain, or 
> whatever.  The PET is very good for staging the disease and 
> can be used to follow the progression. It is rather expensive
> so works best with another marker, such as a blood antigen test,
> if the tumor is too small to see on a CT scan.  
> 
> The PET is a functional process while the CT scan is a direct
> image process so they work well together if the tumor is big
> enough to see on a CT scan.
> 
> Hope this helps......Al Larson
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically-generated notice.  If you'd like to be removed
> from the mailing list, please visit the Medicine-On-Line Discussion Forum
> at <http://www.meds.com/con_faq.html>, or send an email message to:
> majordomo@lists.meds.com
> with the subject line blank and the body of the message containing the
> line:
> unsubscribe mol-cancer your-email-address
> where the phrase your-email-address is replaced with your actual email
> address.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically-generated notice.  If you'd like to be removed
from the mailing list, please visit the Medicine-On-Line Discussion Forum
at <http://www.meds.com/con_faq.html>, or send an email message to:
majordomo@lists.meds.com
with the subject line blank and the body of the message containing the line:
unsubscribe mol-cancer your-email-address
where the phrase your-email-address is replaced with your actual email
address.
------------------------------------------------------------------------