ken naehring wrote:
>
> Marty, I was grateful to read you information on PET scans. I am blessed
> to have a hospital in Cincinnati that does them and the cost is about
> $1900.00. That will get me the chest, lungs and liver. It would be
> another charge to do the brain. So the test is expensive, but it has been
> submitted to the insurance company and I pray that they will understand its
> significance for me and approve it. Thanks for showing it isn't nonsense.
> Carla
>
Dear Carla,
I do believe that somehow you will be compensated monetarily. Push them,
as it is important and technoligically it is better than catscans. When
this is proven to the insurance company and that cat scans have
limitations then I believe they will not have any doubt but to
compensate you. I have heard of cases here in California where that is a
fact.
God Bless YOu
marty
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically-generated notice. If you'd like to be removed
from the mailing list, please visit the Medicine-On-Line Discussion Forum
at <http://www.meds.com/con_faq.html>, or send an email message to:
majordomo@lists.meds.com
with the subject line blank and the body of the message containing the line:
unsubscribe mol-cancer your-email-address
where the phrase your-email-address is replaced with your actual email
address.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
